What is this obssesion[sic] with "expressiveness"? Go write poertry [sic] if you want to be expressvive.[sic]Remember that ultimately our jobs are (usually) to solve some kind of business problem. We're aiming for a finish line, a goal. The programmer's job is translate the language of the business person to the language of the computer.
The whole point of compilers, interpreters, layers of abstraction and what-not are to shorten the semantic distance between our intent and the way the computer thinks of things.
To be honest, this is not very convincing; the moment you mention "semantics", is the moment many developers will close your blog and go do something "productive".
The argument for expressiveness is ultimately quite simple: the more expressive the language, the more you can do in fewer lines of code. This means that 3 lines of Ruby code might take 12 lines in C#, and 15 lines of C# could be compressed to 2 lines of Ruby while retaining readability and maintainability .
Consider viewing Ruby as a C# code generator, where 2 lines of Ruby code can generate 12 lines of C#. That actually sounds like a pretty good idea doesn't it? You would never write a generator to go the other way around though would you?
More expressive languages also tend to be simpler and more coherent. There are all sorts of little ad-hoc rules to Java and C# that you would not find in most functional languages.
You can readily see the differences in expressiveness at the Alioth language shootout. Set the metrics to CPU:0, memory:0, GZIP:1, which means we only care about the GZIP'd size of the source code. You'll see that functional languages tend to come out on top. Ironically, Ruby is first lending weight to the above blog post on Ruby's expressiveness.
Expressiveness is the whole driving force behind DSLs: a DSL is more expressive in solving the problems it was designed for. For instance, a relational database DSL specific to managing blogs could generate perhaps 100 lines of SQL per single line of DSL code. It would take you far more code to emulate that 1 DSL line in C#.
So the expressiveness argument is quite compelling if you simply view it as a code generation metric: the more expressive the language, the more code it can generate for you for the same number of characters typed. That means you do your job faster, and more importantly, with fewer errors.
Why fewer errors? Studies have shown that developers generally write about 20-30 correct lines of code per day. That means 20 lines of correct C# code or 20 lines of correct Ruby code. It just so happens that those 20 lines of correct Ruby can generate 100 lines of correct C#, which means you're now 5x more productive than your C#-only developer next door. Do you see the advantages now?
 These numbers are completely bogus and are used purely for illustrative purposes.